About the author

mm

freedom

The editors and writers of Patriots4Freedom are dedicated to searching out threats to American Freedom. Don't stand by while the nanny state takes away your choices, or Big Tech stifles your free speech. Take a stand and fight for your liberty!

Related Articles

8 Comments

  1. 1

    ernest fox

    the tin pot dictator does it again

    Reply
  2. 2

    Muhammad Shabbir

    Be sad. In such like situation a prudent and responsible leader is required to use his best ability in order to calm down the volatile atmosphere but unfortunately the leader has miscalculated and instead of using brain he is taking decisions from his heart and ambitions. Usa according to general people around the world is an heaven on the earth where citizens enjoy full freedom in trade politics justice and religion but unfortunately one wrong decision has put on fire the entire country. A police officer who did wrong along with companions could be charged and matter could decided by the courts instead of defending the wrong doers. I love usa and its citizens irrespective of their backgrounds. My humble request to the leadership is to please bow down before the public and cool down the situation. It would be in the best interest of state it’s institutions and citizens.Allah swt bless usa and it’s people.God bless us all.

    Reply
  3. 3

    BobK

    I would like to see the people behind all these protesters to be prosecuted. That would more then likely all disciples of Soros,which would be Bill Ayers, Holder, Pelosi, Obama,Shumer, Hillary, etc. Follow the money.

    Reply
  4. 4

    J. Moser

    How does Ms Wilson’s testimony jibe with the news(?) that he had been diagnosed with COVID-19

    Reply
  5. 5

    Whittaker Walt

    The first step in “patriots4freedom.com’s dedication to “searching out threats to America’s Freedom” should be to make extremely clear about the “freedoms” you are talking about. For example, our country’s gun owners and gun lovers invariably site our Constitution’s 2nd amendment which was written to allow members of an organized malita to bear arms which, at the time of it’s writing meant single shot flintlock and/or cap&ball long guns; not rifles ( rifling of long gun barrels was not even invented when the amendment was added, nor were long guns, or pistols for that matter, that were capable of firing multiple round without re-loading. I would suggest, if there is to be an argument for our citizens to carry and bear arms today, it must be stated in an amendment to the 2nd amendment that covers the weapons available at this time with a caviot that it can be updated as new weapons are developed that have characteristics that exceed what is availble today. As well, we must address “free speach” in the context to how we are able to communicate today in ways that were naver dreamed of when the our Constitution was written.

    So, before one begins worrying about our “freedom’s”and having them taken away from us we damn well better understand what they actually are as defined in our Constitution, and if they require updating and modification to make sense today and in the future, the issues shoud be brought before our Supreme Court; of course if changes are to be considered that would have to wait until we had a balanced Supreme Court, not one that was stacked to favor one party or another unlike what we have at this moment in time.

    Our Constitution, like The Holy Bible requires some serious updating, each written centries ago; one 250 years ago the other, at least the New Testamnet version of it, 2,000 years ago. Just think about the Ten Commandments, how many of them would be relevant today: Adultery: yeah right; Bearing False Witness: are you serious; Killing: it wasn’t even relevant the day it was carved on the tablet; Keeping holy the Sabbath, may be on occassion as long as something fun wasn’t going on that meant “can’t make it today, sorry, God”.

    See where I’m going with this? I mean think about “Thou Shall Not Kill” in todays context; perhaps this Commandment should be modified to include exceptions like it’s OK if the person you kill pisses you off, or if you’re not too crazy about the color of a persons skin, or hey, my commanding officer said it was OK.

    That’s all for now folks; I have to go next door to covet my neighbor’s wife before her husband come home from the unemployment office.

    Reply
  6. 6

    Carolyn

    that should have been done as soon as they started to protest it is a shame what they are doing to people and the things that they have put there whole life into this is not about the killing of a black man anymore its about destroying our country and all that it stands for.

    Reply
  7. 7

    Eugene Ricca

    All I can say is owning a handgun is not what we need as good people. From now on we need 2 or 3 AR 15’s or AK 14’s. is necessary with mobs like we have been seeing looting and burning businesses.

    If they come to my home or business they won’t come back the next night to do more destruction as they like doing.

    Trump knows the right way to handle these animals.

    Reply
  8. 8

    Sylvia Allen

    It’s a tough call, pitting American soldiers against the American public, but if that American public can’t control themselves, someone needs to step up to the plate. Our wimpy Demo politicians are hiding in lock down. And may God have mercy on all of us!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright Listabilities, LLC All rights reserved